Originally, the pair ye and you was used along with thee and thou to refer to people in the second person, ye and you for plural and thee and thou for singular. Listeners and readers have to interpret them as best they can. It is just a phrase people say. Another point: The E-F dialog is the least likely one to use how'd you. The chances are, however, that most changes they bring about will not be rapid.
Of course the catch to a contraction is that, by definition, it leaves out information, and while it is usually possible to determine the writer's or speaker's intent, there may be ambiguity. Here is an example:— Given the circumstances that the sun is shining right now, and that the weather forecast is good for the rest of the day, you would think it very unlikely to rain later. As the boys run up the basketball court, one of them disappears, revealing the other one to be playing alone and reflecting on the past with his friend. You can also say you would, but not normally before better, which is the idiom. A woman is sitting on a bench, talking to a man, later scenes show the woman pulled from a burning building, and imply the man died in the fire. It's usually not terribly difficult, but there's no guarantee that you'll always get it right, despite the confidence that so many writers have that readers can always read their minds. As far back as the 14th century, the plural forms ye and you began to be used to address one person—usually a superior—as a mark of deference and respect.
Example: You'd better you had better avoid the stalls on the street. By about the middle of the 16th century the contrast in function between ye and you began breaking down, with the effect that you was more frequently used as a subject pronoun as use of ye decreased. This question can be satisfactorily answered only if a specific context is provided. Writing only approximates speech; and in English, the fidelity is worse than usual. You had better put your results in another place. Once this usage of the polite plural began, it gradually grew.
SovereignSun Those are correct, though the contraction is more likely in both cases than the un-contracted form. This use is called the nominative case. You would better put your results in another place. It was even sometimes used to show deliberate disrespect. When the second person plural was used as a grammatical subject, ye was used.
It starts off with two teenage boys in a basketball practice, and then cuts to Chesney's performance, and subjects related to the song's storyline. A possibility or suggestion Since put has the same forms in all tenses, then it's okay to use any. That doesn't mean that the written form would change. Special plural forms were later contrived to hold you chiefly to singular use, such as , you-uns, yez, and. When you're reading, you have to use clues in the piece of discourse you're reading to figure things out.
Despite reaching number 2 on the U. It is about what is most likely to be thought by a person, given the circumstances as they are… whatever they happen to be at the time. E: I'll shoot my girlfriend if she cheats on me. . For example: You had better not be spoiling your dinner, young man! Queen Elizabeth I seems to have used only you in writing, and a user of her prestige must have given you a boost.
If it is I would, the part following of all people should be you would be the last to say the name, for you lost your parents because of him. The boys playing basketball are also seen playing at the same court as kids, then cutting to serving in the military. For example: A: I broke up with my boyfriend because he was cheating on me. I did that because the pronunciation of the spoken English sentences would change. Throughout the video, friends and couples are seen speaking to each other.
This is where social forces came into play: once people begin such a use, it must grow, since people would rather be polite than risk offending others in cases of doubt. This record has since been broken by , which debuted at number 16 two years later. So the simple social drive of good manners has in a few centuries completely remade the second person pronoun in English. Also, you'd think it very surprising if it did happen to rain, later. Billboard Hot Country Songs for the week ending October 1, 2005. Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange! A high-school couple is seen talking together, and flashbacks are seen, implying that the woman was killed in a car crash. The expansion of the contracted sentence is thus You had better put your results in another place btw, use in after put with place.
If you don't want to be ambiguous in writing because the abbreviations don't distinguish the pronunciation very well , it's better to use the full word. The loss of thee and thou—a singular pronoun for everyday use—was clearly noticed by English speakers. Now that you mention it, all the examples I can think of could just as well have been intended to be I would. You began as the grammatical object, used in the following ways: I can see you. As the use of the plural increased, the singular use decreased accordingly: by the beginning of the 17th century, thou and thee marked only an intimate or personal relationship or a superior-to-inferior relationship. If you have a more specific question, post it! It's meaning is not about thinking harder. This change could have been influenced by the first-person plural we used by sovereigns or reflected the impact of French politeness at work in Middle English.